Calibrated intrinsic value vs last close
Illustrative estimate- Last close (VND)
- 25.950
- Calibrated intrinsic value (VND)
- 30.269
Last close × (1 + calibrated gap / 100)
Earnings-capitalised value
Not available: the company reported a loss last year or its shares have too short a price history.
How it is calculated
- 1Measure the gap
Between the model and the last close.
- 2Check the record2015–2024
What gaps of that size went on to earn over the following year.
- 3Apply to the close
That return is applied to the last close.
Keep in mind
- For illustration only: not a validated forecast.
- No uncertainty range: the estimate is a single figure.
- Older record: it has not been re-measured on the current data.
Why it needs review
- The latest cash flow is zero or negative.
This estimate remains visible for checking its calculation. Its inputs require review before using it in a stock comparison. The model comparison behind this value needs review. The estimate does not remove the data limitations listed above.
Comparison assessed 3 Nov 2026Valid through 2 Dec 2026
- Model reliability
- Low
- Model fitInput stabilityRisk checks
- High requires the model’s diagnostic criteria to be met.
- Probability of outperforming peers
- Not assessed
- A separate peer-outperformance probability is unavailable for this valuation.
These assessments address different questions. Neither establishes that the displayed valuation is correct or guarantees a future return.
Valuation Breakdown
Developers often carry land banks at historical cost under VAS, so book value can understate asset value. This model blends two approaches: an RNAV proxy (book value with its property share marked up 1.5×) weighted 40%, and a DCF on normalized cash flows weighted 60%. Highly leveraged firms receive a +2% WACC penalty.
Technical details
RE developers carry large land inventories at historical cost; cash flows depend on project delivery timing. RNAV captures hidden land value, while DCF captures earnings power. The leverage screen guards against over-leveraged developers.
RNAV proxy: the property share of BVPS (investment property, fixed assets and inventories over total assets) × 1.5 plus the rest at book, or 1.25× all of book when that share is 10% or less or unknown, cut by up to 50% as D/E rises above 2. DCF: 5-year projection on median cash flow with CAPM-derived WACC. If D/E > 3 or interest coverage < 1.5, WACC is increased by 2%. Final value = 40% RNAV + 60% DCF.
Property developers and real estate firms with significant land banks recorded at below-market historical cost.
We take the model’s gap to the last close, read what gaps of that size went on to earn over the following year in our 2015 to 2024 record, and apply that to the last close.
Last close × (1 + calibrated gap / 100)
DCF Sensitivity
Illustrative calibrated values from the standalone DCF scenarios below, anchored to the same last close. These scenarios leave out the other parts of a blended model and do not reproduce the headline value.
Earnings Quality
Financial Forensics
Ranked vs Vietnamese peers. The −1.78 Beneish cutoff is US-calibrated; ~28% of VN stocks exceed it.
Checks measured on Vietnamese companies · FY2025
- Cash conversion, 3 yearsOperating cash flow / net profit
- −2.708th pctile
- Receivables outside the trade cyclePrepayments to suppliers, loans and other long-term receivables / total assets
- 8.5%77th pctile
- Accumulated losses / paid-in capitalUndistributed earnings below zero
- None
- Consecutive years of net lossProfit after tax of the parent
- 0
- Owner's equityWithout the non-controlling interest
- Positive
Percentiles rank each fiscal year against Vietnamese non-financial companies (0 lowest, 100 highest). Over FY2015-2024, low cash conversion and a large share of receivables outside the trade cycle came before more listing trouble and more net losses the next year.
Statutory loss tests (Decree 155/2020/NĐ-CP, Art. 120(1)(e), amended by Decree 245/2025/NĐ-CP): a HOSE or HNX listing is cancelled when the audited annual statements show net losses in each of the latest 3 years, accumulated losses above the paid-in charter capital, or negative owner's equity. Read here from the annual statements as the data vendor publishes them.
The company shows several accounting signals of elevated earnings aggressiveness versus Vietnamese peers: a Beneish M-Score of -0.5166 (91st percentile among Vietnamese peers) with a year-over-year increase of +0.89, and low overall earnings-quality (26.9/100) driven by very weak cash conversion (0.0/100) and revenue quality (0.0/100). At the same time, receivables quality scores strongly (100/100) and there are no accumulated losses or statutory loss triggers in the published annual statements.
- Beneish M-Score -0.5166: measures the likelihood of earnings manipulation using eight financial ratios; company ranks in the 91st percentile versus Vietnamese peers (higher = more aggressive accounting relative to peers) and the M-Score rose by +0.89 year-over-year (a substantial trajectory change). Note: the -1.78 cutoff is US-calibrated and less directly applicable to Vietnam.
- Earnings-Quality total 26.9/100 with very low subcomponents: Cash conversion 0.0/100 (operating cash flow poorly converting reported profits), Revenue quality 0.0/100 (signals about persistence and quality of reported revenue), Margin quality 19.5/100 and Accruals quality 15.9/100 — these point to weak reported profitability and heavy reliance on non-cash or non-recurring items.
- Three-year cash conversion (operating cash flow / net profit) = -2.70 (8th percentile among Vietnamese non-financials): measures whether reported profits are turning into operating cash; a negative and low percentile indicates profits have not generated cash over the last three years.
- TATA (total accruals to total assets) = 0.2811: measures the size of accruals relative to assets; a relatively large positive value suggests earnings contain substantial accruals.
- LVGI (sales general and administrative to inventory/ gross?) = 1.4620 and SGI 2.4091 (Sales Growth Index): high SGI (2.4091) measures rapid revenue growth relative to peers and LVGI/GMI/DEPI movements indicate inventory and cost dynamics that can accompany aggressive recognition (DEPI 1.1032, AQI 1.1315).
- Altman Z-Score 1.56 (distress zone): measures proximity to bankruptcy using five balance-sheet and income items; a score of 1.56 places the company in the distress zone for financial health.
- Director-deal registrations in 2025-10-30 to 2026-10-30: 1 sale registration (1 trader; 1 without a volume) and 5 purchase registrations (5 traders; 28,000,000 shares; 2 without a volume). These are registered intentions with the exchange, not executed trades.
- Receivables quality 100.0/100: measures the proportion and behavior of receivables; a top score suggests receivables are not the primary source of accounting concern.
- No accumulated losses and owner's equity (excluding minority interest) positive: accumulated losses absent and equity is positive, so the company does not meet statutory loss thresholds reported in the financial statements.
- Piotroski F-Score 4/9: a neutral-to-weak fundamental signal (measures profitability, leverage/liquidity, and operating efficiency across nine binary tests) rather than an extreme deterioration.
Top shareholders are dispersed with the largest institutional holder at 10.3% and no single holder above 50%; a listed group holds 21.5% of SGT (significant influence). Several institutions and an individual appear among the top holders. Director-deal registrations show several insiders registered purchases and one registered sale in the last year (registrations, not executed trades).
- Compare FY2025 operating cash flow with parent net profit in the consolidated cash-flow statement and the cash-flow note to confirm the drivers of the three-year cash-conversion ratio (-2.70).
- Review the receivables/similar-account schedules and the related-party disclosures to identify the composition of the 8.5% of total assets classified as receivables outside the trade cycle (prepayments, loans receivable, long-term receivables).
- Inspect the notes on revenue recognition and significant contracts (revenue notes, advances from customers) to reconcile why revenue quality scores 0.0/100 while SGI is 2.4091.
- Examine the accruals and working-capital schedule and the auditor’s report for commentary on large accrual items (TATA = 0.2811) and any emphasis-of-matter paragraphs relating to going concern or accounting estimates.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
- P/B
- 0.99
- P/S
- 3.66
- ROE
- 9.7%
- ROA
- 3.7%
- EPS
- 2.234
- BVPS
- 26.335
- Gross Margin
- 47.7%
- Net Margin
- 33.0%
- D/E
- 1.07
- Current Ratio
- 4.56
- Rev Growth
- +140.9%
- Profit Growth
- +462.1%
- EV/EBITDA
- 15.22
- Div Yield
- —
Company Overview
- Shares outstanding
- 942M
- Charter Capital
- 9,418B VND
- Sector (ICB L2)
- Bất động sản
- Industry (ICB L3)
- Bất động sản
- Sub-industry
- Bất động sản
- Company Type
- CT