Calibrated intrinsic value vs last close
Illustrative estimate- Last close (VND)
- 22.950
- Calibrated intrinsic value (VND)
- 26.769
Last close × (1 + calibrated gap / 100)
Earnings-capitalised value
Not available: the company reported a loss last year or its shares have too short a price history.
How it is calculated
- 1Measure the gap
Between the model and the last close.
- 2Check the record2015–2024
What gaps of that size went on to earn over the following year.
- 3Apply to the close
That return is applied to the last close.
Keep in mind
- For illustration only: not a validated forecast.
- No uncertainty range: the estimate is a single figure.
- Older record: it has not been re-measured on the current data.
Why it needs review
- The model uses profit in place of cash flow, which was not available.
- The latest cash flow is zero or negative.
This estimate remains visible for checking its calculation. Its inputs require review before using it in a stock comparison. The model comparison behind this value needs review. The estimate does not remove the data limitations listed above.
Comparison assessed 3 Nov 2026Valid through 2 Dec 2026
- Model reliability
- Low
- Model fitInput stabilityRisk checks
- High requires the model’s diagnostic criteria to be met.
- Probability of outperforming peers
- Not assessed
- A separate peer-outperformance probability is unavailable for this valuation.
These assessments address different questions. Neither establishes that the displayed valuation is correct or guarantees a future return.
Valuation Breakdown
Developers often carry land banks at historical cost under VAS, so book value can understate asset value. This model blends two approaches: an RNAV proxy (book value with its property share marked up 1.5×) weighted 40%, and a DCF on normalized cash flows weighted 60%. Highly leveraged firms receive a +2% WACC penalty.
Technical details
RE developers carry large land inventories at historical cost; cash flows depend on project delivery timing. RNAV captures hidden land value, while DCF captures earnings power. The leverage screen guards against over-leveraged developers.
RNAV proxy: the property share of BVPS (investment property, fixed assets and inventories over total assets) × 1.5 plus the rest at book, or 1.25× all of book when that share is 10% or less or unknown, cut by up to 50% as D/E rises above 2. DCF: 5-year projection on median cash flow with CAPM-derived WACC. If D/E > 3 or interest coverage < 1.5, WACC is increased by 2%. Final value = 40% RNAV + 60% DCF.
Property developers and real estate firms with significant land banks recorded at below-market historical cost.
We take the model’s gap to the last close, read what gaps of that size went on to earn over the following year in our 2015 to 2024 record, and apply that to the last close.
Last close × (1 + calibrated gap / 100)
DCF Sensitivity
Illustrative calibrated values from the standalone DCF scenarios below, anchored to the same last close. These scenarios leave out the other parts of a blended model and do not reproduce the headline value.
Earnings Quality
Financial Forensics
Ranked vs Vietnamese peers. The −1.78 Beneish cutoff is US-calibrated; ~28% of VN stocks exceed it.
Checks measured on Vietnamese companies · FY2025
- Cash conversion, 3 yearsOperating cash flow / net profit
- 0.0923rd pctile
- Receivables outside the trade cyclePrepayments to suppliers, loans and other long-term receivables / total assets
- 2.1%50th pctile
- Accumulated losses / paid-in capitalUndistributed earnings below zero
- None
- Consecutive years of net lossProfit after tax of the parent
- 0
- Owner's equityWithout the non-controlling interest
- Positive
Percentiles rank each fiscal year against Vietnamese non-financial companies (0 lowest, 100 highest). Over FY2015-2024, low cash conversion and a large share of receivables outside the trade cycle came before more listing trouble and more net losses the next year.
Statutory loss tests (Decree 155/2020/NĐ-CP, Art. 120(1)(e), amended by Decree 245/2025/NĐ-CP): a HOSE or HNX listing is cancelled when the audited annual statements show net losses in each of the latest 3 years, accumulated losses above the paid-in charter capital, or negative owner's equity. Read here from the annual statements as the data vendor publishes them.
The company’s Beneish M-Score is -1.3412 (83rd percentile vs Vietnamese peers) with a year-over-year increase of +0.62, signalling that its accounting profile is more aggressive than most local peers and has moved materially this year. Earnings-quality diagnostics are weak overall (Earnings Quality 15.0/100) driven by very low cash conversion (0.0/100) and receivables/revenue quality (0.0/100), while solvency/bankruptcy distance appears comfortable (Altman Z-Score 4.87) and operating fundamentals are neutral (Piotroski F-Score 5/9).
- Beneish M-Score -1.3412 and Vietnam peer percentile 83rd: the score is higher (more aggressive) than ~83% of Vietnamese non-financial peers; the YoY change of +0.62 shows a notable upward move in the score (Beneish components should be read individually).
- DSRI (Days Sales Receivable Index) = 1.4476: receivables/sales grew relative to prior year, which can indicate revenue recognition timing or slower collections.
- TATA (Total Accruals to Total Assets) = 0.1584: unusually high accruals (15.84% of assets) indicating earnings are supported by accrual accounting rather than cash flow.
- AQI (Quality of Accruals Index) = 1.1198 and LVGI (Leverage Index) = 1.2332: accrual quality deterioration and increased leverage versus prior period are flagged in Beneish components.
- Earnings-Quality sub-scores extremely low: Cash conversion 0.0/100 and Receivables quality 0.0/100 and Revenue quality 0.0/100 — indicating profits are not converting into cash, receivables composition or aging is concerning, and revenue reliability metrics are weak.
- Three-year cash conversion (operating cash flow / net profit) = 0.09 (23rd percentile): reported profits are not translating into operating cash (only 9% conversion), a common red flag for earnings sustainability.
- Altman Z-Score 4.87: places the company in the ‘safe’ zone for bankruptcy distance under the Altman model (higher distance from insolvency).
- Piotroski F-Score 5/9: a neutral score, with some improving and some weakening operating/financial fundamentals rather than clear deterioration.
- No accumulated losses and owner’s equity (ex. minority interest) positive: retained earnings are not negative and equity is positive on the balance sheet.
- Receivables outside the trade cycle = 2.1% of total assets (50th percentile): exposures such as prepayments, long-term receivables or loans to related parties are present but not unusually large relative to peers.
Ownership is concentrated: Sado holds 40.5% and Vingroup (VIC) 18.4%, together commanding a majority influence; several foreign institutional holders are present but much smaller (WP Investments III 4.9%, PYN 2.8%, RWC 2.0%). This structure implies group/controlling-shareholder influence over strategy and reporting consistent with common Vietnamese listed-group dynamics.
- Compare the FY2025 movements in trade receivables, long-term receivables, and prepayments with the related-party note(s) and schedule(s) in the financial statements to identify the composition of the 2.1% of assets classified as receivables outside the trade cycle.
- Reconcile operating cash flow to reported net profit in the consolidated cash flow statement and the cash-flow notes to trace why three-year cash conversion is 0.09 (low) and to identify major non-cash adjustments or timing items.
- Inspect the notes on revenue recognition and the accounts-receivable ageing table (or note) to assess the drivers behind DSRI = 1.4476 and the 0.0/100 revenue/receivables quality scores.
- Review the consolidated statement of changes in equity and the auditor’s report for any emphasis-of-matter or qualification, and confirm the statutory loss test disclosures — the FY2025 audited statements show none of the statutory loss-cancellation tests were met.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
- P/B
- 1.13
- P/S
- 6.18
- ROE
- 14.3%
- ROA
- 11.1%
- EPS
- 2.837
- BVPS
- 21.286
- Gross Margin
- 53.5%
- Net Margin
- 72.9%
- D/E
- 0.13
- Current Ratio
- 1.54
- Rev Growth
- −1.1%
- Profit Growth
- +57.4%
- EV/EBITDA
- 10.71
- Div Yield
- —
Company Overview
- Shares outstanding
- 2,272M
- Charter Capital
- 22,723B VND
- Sector (ICB L2)
- Bất động sản
- Industry (ICB L3)
- Bất động sản
- Sub-industry
- Bất động sản
- Company Type
- CT