Calibrated intrinsic value vs last close
Illustrative estimate- Last close (VND)
- 8.600
- Calibrated intrinsic value (VND)
- 8.239
Last close × (1 + calibrated gap / 100)
Earnings-capitalised value
Not available: the company reported a loss last year or its shares have too short a price history.
How it is calculated
- 1Measure the gap
Between the model and the last close.
- 2Check the record2015–2024
What gaps of that size went on to earn over the following year.
- 3Apply to the close
That return is applied to the last close.
Keep in mind
- For illustration only: not a validated forecast.
- No uncertainty range: the estimate is a single figure.
- Older record: it has not been re-measured on the current data.
Also note
- Trading liquidity is low.
Comparison assessed 3 Nov 2026Valid through 2 Dec 2026
- Model reliability
- Low
- Model fitInput stabilityRisk checks
- High requires the model’s diagnostic criteria to be met.
- Probability of outperforming peers
- 51.7%
- 12 monthsHistorical calibration
- Chance the return beats the median return of its sector peers.
These assessments address different questions. Neither establishes that the displayed valuation is correct or guarantees a future return.
12-month sector-relative outlook
Median 12-month return difference versus Cyclicals peers, for model gaps like this one.
- Not an absolute return forecast.
- Not a price target.
- A stock can underperform its sector and still rise.
- The sector’s historical range, not a prediction interval for this stock.
- Actual returns can fall outside it.
Valuation Breakdown
Cyclical companies (chemicals, oil & gas, basic resources) have earnings that swing dramatically with commodity prices and economic cycles. Valuing them on a single year's earnings is misleading: they look cheap at peaks and expensive at troughs. This model uses 7-year median EBITDA ("mid-cycle" earnings) and a 7-year median EV/EBITDA multiple to estimate what the firm is worth at a normal point in the cycle.
Technical details
Commodity/basic-material earnings swing with global prices. Using mid-cycle EBITDA normalizes across booms and busts, preventing overpayment at cyclical peaks. EV/EBITDA is preferred over P/E because it's capital-structure-neutral and not distorted by depreciation policies.
Computes the 7-year median EBITDA and the 7-year median EV/EBITDA. With fewer than 5 years of its own EBITDA, the company's EBITDA is estimated as revenue x the sector median margin. When mid-cycle EBITDA is not positive, the value is 70% of book value per share. Fair Value = (Mid-Cycle EBITDA x Fair EV/EBITDA) - Net Debt.
Commodity producers, basic materials, chemicals, and oil & gas companies with multi-year earnings cycles.
We take the model’s gap to the last close, read what gaps of that size went on to earn over the following year in our 2015 to 2024 record, and apply that to the last close.
Last close × (1 + calibrated gap / 100)
Earnings Quality
Financial Forensics
Ranked vs Vietnamese peers. The −1.78 Beneish cutoff is US-calibrated; ~28% of VN stocks exceed it.
Checks measured on Vietnamese companies · FY2025
- Cash conversion, 3 yearsOperating cash flow / net profit
- −7.554th pctile
- Receivables outside the trade cyclePrepayments to suppliers, loans and other long-term receivables / total assets
- 16.6%88th pctile
- Accumulated losses / paid-in capitalUndistributed earnings below zero
- None
- Consecutive years of net lossProfit after tax of the parent
- 0
- Owner's equityWithout the non-controlling interest
- Positive
Percentiles rank each fiscal year against Vietnamese non-financial companies (0 lowest, 100 highest). Over FY2015-2024, low cash conversion and a large share of receivables outside the trade cycle came before more listing trouble and more net losses the next year.
Statutory loss tests (Decree 155/2020/NĐ-CP, Art. 120(1)(e), amended by Decree 245/2025/NĐ-CP): a HOSE or HNX listing is cancelled when the audited annual statements show net losses in each of the latest 3 years, accumulated losses above the paid-in charter capital, or negative owner's equity. Read here from the annual statements as the data vendor publishes them. The company trades on UPCoM, where these tests do not apply.
The company shows multiple accounting signals that merit scrutiny: a Beneish M-Score of -0.6807 (90th percentile versus Vietnamese peers) with a year-over-year rise of +1.10, driven largely by a very high AQI (3.9281) and rising SGAI (1.3764). Operating cash metrics and profitability metrics are weak — three-year cash conversion is -7.55 (4th percentile) and the Earnings-Quality score is low at 35.5/100 (notably Cash conversion 0/100 and Margin quality 0/100) — while receivables outside the trade cycle are material at 16.6% of total assets (88th percentile).
- Beneish M-Score -0.6807: this is above the US -1.78 cutoff but that cutoff is US-calibrated; within Vietnam the company ranks at the 90th percentile (higher = more aggressive accounting than peers) and the M-Score rose by +1.10 year-over-year (a notable trajectory).
- AQI (Asset Quality Index) = 3.9281: AQI measures increases in ‘‘non‑productive’’ assets (e.g., property, receivables, other long‑term assets) relative to assets; a very high AQI is a common signal of earnings management or capitalisation of costs.
- SGAI (Sales, General & Administrative to sales index) = 1.3764: SGAI >1 indicates selling and administrative expenses growing faster than sales year-over-year, which can reflect cost capitalisation or one-off items affecting margins.
- TATA (Total Accruals to Assets) = 0.1657: positive large accruals (16.57% of assets) indicate earnings have a substantial accrual component relative to the asset base, consistent with the low accruals-quality score (42.5/100).
- Cash conversion (3‑year OCF / net profit) = -7.55: the company is in the 4th percentile versus Vietnamese non‑financial peers, indicating reported profits have not converted into operating cash over three years.
- Receivables outside the trade cycle = 16.6% of total assets: at the 88th percentile, this level (prepayments to suppliers, loans receivable, long‑term receivables) is unusually high and contributes to the AQI and revenue‑quality concerns.
- Earnings-quality components: overall E‑Q 35.5/100, with Cash conversion 0/100 and Margin quality 0/100 — these underline weak cash and margin sustainability despite Receivables quality being 100/100.
- Piotroski F-Score = 2/9: weak fundamental signals (profitability, leverage, liquidity, and operating efficiency measures are generally poor), which aligns with low cash conversion and high accruals.
- Receivables quality = 100.0/100: within the earnings‑quality framework receivables metrics look strong (no immediate signs of revenue recognition via trade receivables manipulation).
- DSRI (Days Sales Receivable Index) = 0.7606: DSRI <1 suggests receivables turnover has improved year-over-year rather than ballooned from sales recognition — consistent with the perfect receivables‑quality score.
- DEPI = 1.0000 and LVGI = 0.8904: stable depreciation index (DEPI ≈1) suggests no aggressive changes to depreciation policies, and LVGI <1 indicates leverage velocity is not accelerating unusually.
- No accumulated losses and owner’s equity (ex‑minority) positive: the company has not reported accumulated losses and parent profit shows 0 consecutive years of net loss through FY2025, which are signs of solvency in published statements.
Ownership is concentrated: three individuals and two institutions together hold large stakes (Nguyễn Thủy Tiên 20.9%, Vietravel Group 14.6%, Nguyễn Quốc Kỳ 11.2%, VinaCapital 9.9%). Director/insider registrations in 2025–10–30 to 2026–10–30 show 4 purchase registrations totalling 750,000 shares (net registered +1.14% of shares outstanding) and 0 sale registrations; these are registered intentions disclosed to the exchange, not executed trades.
- Compare the year‑over‑year change in the 'other long‑term receivables' and 'prepayments to suppliers' lines in the Notes to the Financial Statements with the AQI components — quantify the increase that produces AQI = 3.9281.
- Reconcile the consolidated 'operating cash flow' line and the parent 'profit for the year' across the past three annual reports to reproduce the 3‑year cash conversion ratio = -7.55; inspect the reconciliation of profit to cash flow for large non‑cash items or working‑capital movements.
- Inspect the related‑party disclosures and the schedules for 'loans and advances to customers/related parties' to identify the composition of the 16.6% of assets classified as receivables outside the trade cycle.
- Review the notes on 'selling, general and administrative expenses' and accounting policy disclosures for capitalization criteria to understand drivers of SGAI = 1.3764 and whether costs have been reclassified or capitalised.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
- P/B
- 0.75
- P/S
- 0.08
- ROE
- 0.4%
- ROA
- 0.1%
- EPS
- 39
- BVPS
- 11.867
- Gross Margin
- 6.1%
- Net Margin
- 0.0%
- D/E
- 1.06
- Current Ratio
- 1.18
- Rev Growth
- +7.0%
- Profit Growth
- −96.5%
- EV/EBITDA
- —
- Div Yield
- 9.8%
Company Overview
- Shares outstanding
- 65.6M
- Charter Capital
- 656B VND
- Sector (ICB L2)
- Du lịch và Giải trí
- Industry (ICB L3)
- Du lịch & Giải trí
- Sub-industry
- Vận tải hành khách & Du lịch
- Company Type
- CT