TNM
Công ty Cổ phần Xuất nhập khẩu và Xây dựng Công trình
Earnings Quality
Financial Forensics
Ranked vs Vietnamese peers. The −1.78 Beneish cutoff is US-calibrated; ~28% of VN stocks exceed it.
Checks measured on Vietnamese companies · FY2016
- Cash conversion, 3 yearsOperating cash flow / net profit
- 19.1899th pctile
- Receivables outside the trade cyclePrepayments to suppliers, loans and other long-term receivables / total assets
- 10.7%85th pctile
- Accumulated losses / paid-in capitalUndistributed earnings below zero
- None
- Consecutive years of net lossProfit after tax of the parent
- 0
- Owner's equityWithout the non-controlling interest
- Positive
Percentiles rank each fiscal year against Vietnamese non-financial companies (0 lowest, 100 highest). Over FY2015-2024, low cash conversion and a large share of receivables outside the trade cycle came before more listing trouble and more net losses the next year.
Statutory loss tests (Decree 155/2020/NĐ-CP, Art. 120(1)(e), amended by Decree 245/2025/NĐ-CP): a HOSE or HNX listing is cancelled when the audited annual statements show net losses in each of the latest 3 years, accumulated losses above the paid-in charter capital, or negative owner's equity. Read here from the annual statements as the data vendor publishes them. The company trades on UPCoM, where these tests do not apply.
The company's Beneish M‑Score is -1.2107 (Vietnam peer percentile 80th) with a year‑over‑year rise of +0.58, indicating its accrual/recognition patterns are more aggressive than most Vietnamese peers and have shifted materially year‑on‑year. Earnings‑quality metrics are mixed: accruals quality is relatively high at 86.0/100 but cash conversion, receivables quality, margin quality and revenue quality all score 0.0/100; the three‑year cash conversion ratio is 19.18 (99th percentile) and receivables outside the trade cycle are 10.7% of total assets (85th percentile). The Piotroski F‑Score is 5/9 (neutral).
- Beneish M‑Score = -1.2107 (measures likelihood of earnings manipulation signals); Vietnam peer percentile = 80th (this company is more aggressive vs 80% of Vietnamese peers), year‑over‑year change = +0.58 (the M‑Score moved notably from the prior year).
- DSRI = 3.1550 (days‑sales‑in‑receivables index; elevated value suggests receivables and revenue recognition may have inflated reported sales/receivables relative to prior period).
- AQI = 3.0869 (quality of accruals index; elevated value indicates unusual accruals behavior relative to peers).
- SGAI = 4.2775 (selling, general & administrative expenses index; large change suggests expense recognition shifts that can affect reported profit).
- Cash conversion (operating cash flow / net profit, 3 years) = 19.18 (99th percentile among Vietnamese non‑financials; low ratio means reported profits are not converting into cash).
- Receivables outside the trade cycle = 10.7% of total assets (85th percentile; includes prepayments to suppliers, loans receivable and other long‑term receivables and is relatively large).
- Earnings‑Quality overall = 21.5/100 with revenue quality = 0.0/100, margin quality = 0.0/100 and receivables quality = 0.0/100 (these component zeros signal very weak metrics on cash flow, margins and revenue persistence).
- Accruals quality = 86.0/100 (measures how much earnings are driven by accruals versus cash; a relatively high score here suggests reported accruals are not extreme on the specific accrual metric used).
- TATA = 0.0351 (Total Accruals to Total Assets; a modest positive value indicating accruals are present but not extremely large in absolute terms).
- LVGI = 0.8961 (leverage growth index; below 1.0 implies leverage has not expanded dramatically on the index used).
- Piotroski F‑Score = 5/9 (measures nine fundamental signals; a midpoint score represents neutral/ mixed fundamentals rather than clear deterioration).
- No accumulated losses and owner's equity (net of minority) positive; net loss (parent) = 0 consecutive years up to FY2016 (the statutory insolvency/loss tests in Decree 155/2020 apply to HOSE/HNX listings but this company is on UPCoM where that delisting rule does not apply).
Ownership is concentrated in a small number of individuals: top three shareholders hold 12.8% + 8.6% + 7.9% = 29.3%, and the top five together hold about 35.8%. These are individual (private) shareholders rather than state or widely dispersed public ownership; no director‑deal registrations were provided in the data.
- Compare the line(s) for 'prepayments to suppliers', 'loans receivable' and 'other long‑term receivables' in the notes to total assets and to the 10.7% figure reported for receivables outside the trade cycle.
- Reconcile operating cash flow (cash flow statement) to reported net profit for each of the three years and confirm the components producing the three‑year cash conversion ratio of 19.18 (note the components that reduce cash conversion: changes in working capital, non‑cash items, related‑party cash movements).
- Inspect the revenue and receivables notes and the trade receivables aging to assess the basis for DSRI = 3.1550 (check whether revenue growth is supported by collection patterns and whether any large end‑period receivables or related‑party receivables appear).
- Read the auditor's report and any related‑party transaction disclosures (notes) for descriptions of related‑party loans, guarantees, or group flows that could explain elevated AQI/SGAI or the receivables outside the trade cycle.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
- P/B
- 0.32
- P/S
- 0.11
- ROE
- 18.4%
- ROA
- 1.7%
- EPS
- 2.171
- BVPS
- 12.846
- Gross Margin
- 16.3%
- Net Margin
- 5.7%
- D/E
- 2.73
- Current Ratio
- 1.08
- Rev Growth
- −73.0%
- Profit Growth
- +573.1%
- EV/EBITDA
- 6.77
- Div Yield
- —
Company Overview
- Shares outstanding
- —
- Charter Capital
- —
- Sector (ICB L2)
- Xây dựng và Vật liệu
- Industry (ICB L3)
- Xây dựng và Vật liệu
- Sub-industry
- Xây dựng
- Company Type
- CT