PPE
Công ty Cổ phần Tư vấn Đầu tư PP Enterprise
Calibrated intrinsic value vs last close
Illustrative estimate- Last close (VND)
- 21.900
- Calibrated intrinsic value (VND)
- 22.203
Last close × (1 + calibrated gap / 100)
Earnings-capitalised value
Not available: the company reported a loss last year or its shares have too short a price history.
How it is calculated
- 1Measure the gap
Between the model and the last close.
- 2Check the record2015–2024
What gaps of that size went on to earn over the following year.
- 3Apply to the close
That return is applied to the last close.
Keep in mind
- For illustration only: not a validated forecast.
- No uncertainty range: the estimate is a single figure.
- Older record: it has not been re-measured on the current data.
Why it needs review
- Trading liquidity is below the comparison threshold.
This estimate remains visible for checking its calculation. Its inputs require review before using it in a stock comparison. The model comparison behind this value needs review. The estimate does not remove the data limitations listed above.
Comparison assessed 3 Nov 2026Valid through 29 Nov 2026
- Model reliability
- Low
- Model fitInput stabilityRisk checks
- High requires the model’s diagnostic criteria to be met.
- Probability of outperforming peers
- Not assessed
- A separate peer-outperformance probability is unavailable for this valuation.
These assessments address different questions. Neither establishes that the displayed valuation is correct or guarantees a future return.
Valuation Breakdown
A Discounted Cash Flow model built on Free Cash Flow (FCF), the cash a business generates after operating expenses and capital expenditures. Future FCF is projected for 10 years with gradually decaying growth, then discounted to today's value using WACC. The DCF value is blended 70/30 with a value from the company's own historical P/E.
Technical details
Consumer staples/retail generate steady, predictable free cash flows, making them ideal for DCF. The time value of money principle means a dollar today is worth more than a dollar tomorrow. DCF captures this by discounting future cash flows at a rate reflecting the investment's risk (WACC).
Takes 3-year median FCF as the base. Estimates growth via ROIC x reinvestment rate (Damodaran framework), falling back to historical revenue growth. Projects 10 years with decay toward the sector's long-run growth rate. Discounts at CAPM-derived WACC. Blends 70% of the DCF value with 30% of a P/E value: the company's 5-year median P/E, held between 5x and 25x, times EPS.
Stable consumer businesses (food, beverage, retail, healthcare) with predictable, positive free cash flows.
We take the model’s gap to the last close, read what gaps of that size went on to earn over the following year in our 2015 to 2024 record, and apply that to the last close.
Last close × (1 + calibrated gap / 100)
DCF Sensitivity
Illustrative calibrated values from the standalone DCF scenarios below, anchored to the same last close. These scenarios leave out the other parts of a blended model and do not reproduce the headline value.
Earnings Quality
Financial Forensics
Ranked vs Vietnamese peers. The −1.78 Beneish cutoff is US-calibrated; ~28% of VN stocks exceed it.
Checks measured on Vietnamese companies · FY2025
- Cash conversion, 3 yearsOperating cash flow / net profit
- −0.4118th pctile
- Receivables outside the trade cyclePrepayments to suppliers, loans and other long-term receivables / total assets
- 10.1%81st pctile
- Accumulated losses / paid-in capitalUndistributed earnings below zero
- 0.13×
- Consecutive years of net lossProfit after tax of the parent
- 0
- Owner's equityWithout the non-controlling interest
- Positive
Percentiles rank each fiscal year against Vietnamese non-financial companies (0 lowest, 100 highest). Over FY2015-2024, low cash conversion and a large share of receivables outside the trade cycle came before more listing trouble and more net losses the next year.
Statutory loss tests (Decree 155/2020/NĐ-CP, Art. 120(1)(e), amended by Decree 245/2025/NĐ-CP): a HOSE or HNX listing is cancelled when the audited annual statements show net losses in each of the latest 3 years, accumulated losses above the paid-in charter capital, or negative owner's equity. Read here from the annual statements as the data vendor publishes them.
The company shows multiple accounting signals that warrant attention: a very high Beneish M-Score of 5.3678 (99th percentile vs Vietnamese peers) with a large year-over-year rise of +9.10 indicates the firm’s accounting profile is unusually aggressive relative to peers and has moved materially this year. At the same time liquidity and solvency metrics look mixed — Altman Z-Score is 8.40 (safe zone) while cash conversion over three years is weak at -0.41 (18th percentile), and earnings-quality sub-scores show strong accruals and receivables quality (96.0 and 100.0) but very poor margin and revenue quality (both 0.0).
- Beneish M-Score = 5.3678 (99th percentile vs VN peers; measures likelihood of earnings manipulation using eight accrual and performance ratios) and YoY change +9.10 (large upward move in the score; indicates material change in accounting signals year-over-year).
- SGI (Sales Growth Index) = 10.0000 (part of the M-Score set; extreme growth signal that can stress revenue recognition and related controls).
- AQI (Asset Quality Index) = 1.9627 (part of the M-Score; elevated value indicates a higher share of non-current or potentially less-productive assets such as other receivables, prepayments or intangible reclassifications).
- LVGI (Leverage Index) = 1.3548 (part of the M-Score; rising leverage relative to prior year can pressure profit reporting and off-balance arrangements).
- Cash conversion (3-year operating cash flow / net profit) = -0.41 (18th percentile among Vietnamese non-financials; profits are not converting into cash and the company ranks low on this metric).
- Receivables outside the trade cycle = 10.1% of total assets (81st percentile; material amount of prepayments, loans receivable or long-term receivables relative to peers).
- Margin quality = 0.0/100 and Revenue quality = 0.0/100 (earnings-quality sub-scores; both indicate concerns about the sustainability or reliability of reported margins and revenue flows).
- TATA (Total Accruals to Total Assets) = 0.0099 (non-zero accruals exist; while small in isolation, must be read with other signals such as weak cash conversion).
- Altman Z-Score = 8.40 (places the company in the safe zone for bankruptcy distance; a measure combining profitability, leverage, liquidity and activity).
- Accruals quality = 96.0/100 and Receivables quality = 100.0/100 (high scores; suggest reported accruals and receivables are of relatively high quality by the applied metrics).
- Piotroski F-Score = 4/9 (neutral fundamentals; not deeply negative on the basic nine-point operating/fundamental checklist).
- No statutory loss tests triggered under Decree 155/2020 Art.120(1)(e) (amended by Decree 245/2025) — the audited annual statements do not meet the exchange cancellation conditions listed in that rule.
Ownership is highly concentrated: an individual, Hoàng Việt, holds 44.5%, and two foreign institutional vehicles (ARO2O FINTECH 20.3% and Great Master Pte. Ltd. 19.3%) together control 39.6%, leaving limited public free float. Director-deal registrations between 2025-10-30 and 2026-10-30 show 2 sale registrations (95,200 shares across 2 registrants, one registration without a volume) and 4 purchase registrations (3 registrants, 4 without a volume); these are exchange-registered intentions to trade, not evidence of executed trades.
- Compare the FY2025 notes/schedule for 'Other receivables' and 'Prepayments' to the balance-sheet line to verify the composition of the 10.1% of total assets reported as receivables outside the trade cycle.
- Reconcile operating cash flow and profit in the cash-flow note and management discussion to trace the drivers of the three-year cash conversion ratio of -0.41 (identify non-cash items, working-capital movements and related-party cash flows).
- Inspect the revenue recognition policy note and the revenue schedule for FY2025 to explain the SGI = 10.0000 and the revenue-quality = 0.0 score (look for one-off sales, related-party sales, contract terms, or timing differences).
- Review the capital and reserves note (paid-in capital and retained earnings) and the accumulated losses disclosure to confirm accumulated losses = 0.13x paid-in capital and to verify the parent profit/loss history (0 consecutive years of net loss up to FY2025).
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
- P/B
- 2.52
- P/S
- 0.38
- ROE
- 6.0%
- ROA
- 4.7%
- EPS
- 381
- BVPS
- 8.699
- Gross Margin
- 1.4%
- Net Margin
- 0.9%
- D/E
- 0.00
- Current Ratio
- 1.84
- Rev Growth
- +3492.3%
- Profit Growth
- −55.2%
- EV/EBITDA
- 54.43
- Div Yield
- —
Company Overview
- Shares outstanding
- 3.6M
- Charter Capital
- 36.0B VND
- Sector (ICB L2)
- Hàng & Dịch vụ Công nghiệp
- Industry (ICB L3)
- Tư vấn & Hỗ trợ Kinh doanh
- Sub-industry
- Tư vấn & Hỗ trợ KD
- Company Type
- CT