Earnings Quality
Financial Forensics
Ranked vs Vietnamese peers. The −1.78 Beneish cutoff is US-calibrated; ~28% of VN stocks exceed it.
Checks measured on Vietnamese companies · FY2025
- Receivables outside the trade cyclePrepayments to suppliers, loans and other long-term receivables / total assets
- 37.7%97th pctile
- Accumulated losses / paid-in capitalUndistributed earnings below zero
- 5.23×Statutory test met
- Consecutive years of net lossProfit after tax of the parent
- 11Statutory test met
- Owner's equityWithout the non-controlling interest
- NegativeStatutory test met
Percentiles rank each fiscal year against Vietnamese non-financial companies (0 lowest, 100 highest). Over FY2015-2024, low cash conversion and a large share of receivables outside the trade cycle came before more listing trouble and more net losses the next year.
Statutory loss tests (Decree 155/2020/NĐ-CP, Art. 120(1)(e), amended by Decree 245/2025/NĐ-CP): a HOSE or HNX listing is cancelled when the audited annual statements show net losses in each of the latest 3 years, accumulated losses above the paid-in charter capital, or negative owner's equity. Read here from the annual statements as the data vendor publishes them. The company trades on UPCoM, where these tests do not apply.
The company’s Beneish M-Score is -1.5833 (78th percentile versus Vietnamese peers) with a year-over-year decline of -0.42, indicating accounting metrics that are more aggressive than most Vietnamese peers and a recent move in the score. Earnings-quality components show very high accruals and receivables quality (100/100 each) but very poor cash conversion (10.8/100), margin quality (0/100) and revenue quality (0/100). The Altman Z-Score is -4.08 (distress zone) and the Piotroski F-Score is 4/9 (neutral).
- Beneish M-Score -1.5833 at the 78th Vietnam percentile: measures the likelihood of earnings manipulation relative to peers; higher percentile means more aggressive accounting versus Vietnamese peers and the score moved by -0.42 year-over-year (the YoY change is a secondary cue).
- Altman Z-Score -4.08: measures bankruptcy distance; a negative score in the distress zone suggests weak balance-sheet solvency.
- Receivables outside the trade cycle = 37.7% of total assets (97th Vietnam percentile): this line includes prepayments to suppliers, loans receivable and other long-term receivables and is unusually large relative to peers.
- Accumulated losses = 5.23× paid-in capital and owner’s equity (excluding minority interest) is negative: measures historical retained losses relative to contributed capital and implies a deficit in equity.
- Net loss at parent for 11 consecutive years to FY2025 and losses in each of the latest 3 years: the statements meet statutory loss conditions (accumulated losses above paid-in capital; 3-year loss sequence; negative equity).
- Very low cash-conversion component: Cash conversion score 10.8/100 and TATA (total accruals) = -0.0966 indicate poor ability to convert reported profit to operating cash flows.
- Revenue and margin quality scores are 0/100: the Earnings-Quality composite flags weakness in revenue sustainability and margin reliability.
- SGI (sales growth index) = 2.5359 and GMI (gross margin index) = 1.9761: measures of rapid sales growth and deteriorating gross margins relative to the prior period, which can be associated with aggressive recognition or margin pressure.
- Accruals quality 100.0/100 and Receivables quality 100.0/100: within the earnings-quality framework these components score at the top, suggesting reported accruals and the trade-receivables pattern (as measured by the applied tests) do not raise internal flags.
- DSRI (days' sales receivable index) = 0.3936: this specific Beneish component is well below 1, which typically does not indicate receivable buildups from trade-sales recognition.
- LVGI (leverage change index) = 1.0515 and DEPI (depreciation index) = 1.0586 are close to neutral: these metrics do not show extreme swings in leverage provisioning or depreciation policies.
Ownership is highly concentrated among five individuals: Nguyễn Thương Huyền 24.9%, Đinh Văn Mạnh 24.5%, Nguyễn Thị Hoa 21.2%, Phạm Thị Phương Thúy 11.1% and Lã Tuấn Hưng 9.6%. This concentrated, closely held ownership increases the importance of related-party, group and insider disclosures in the filings.
- Compare the FY2025 note(s) that break down ‘receivables and prepayments’ with the related‑party disclosures to identify how much of the 37.7% of total assets is loans to or prepayments for related parties.
- Reconcile the cash-flow statement (operating cash flows) with reported profit and the TATA/total-accruals note to verify the source of the low cash conversion (10.8/100).
- Inspect the statement of changes in equity and the audited notes showing accumulated losses to confirm the 5.23× paid-in capital figure and the classification that led to negative owner’s equity (excluding minority interest).
- Review the revenue recognition policy note and schedules (segment/revenue rollforwards) to see whether the components behind SGI = 2.5359 and the 0/100 revenue-quality score are explained by legitimate one-off items, related-party contracts, or recurring sales.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
- P/B
- —
- P/S
- 2.13
- ROE
- 7.1%
- ROA
- −8.4%
- EPS
- −2.751
- BVPS
- 0
- Gross Margin
- −48.3%
- Net Margin
- −243.9%
- D/E
- —
- Current Ratio
- 0.41
- Rev Growth
- +153.7%
- Profit Growth
- −8052.9%
- EV/EBITDA
- —
- Div Yield
- —
Company Overview
- Shares outstanding
- 27.0M
- Charter Capital
- 270B VND
- Sector (ICB L2)
- Xây dựng và Vật liệu
- Industry (ICB L3)
- Xây dựng và Vật liệu
- Sub-industry
- Xây dựng
- Company Type
- CT