PSH
Công ty Cổ phần Thương mại Đầu tư Dầu khí Nam Sông Hậu
Earnings Quality
Financial Forensics
Ranked vs Vietnamese peers. The −1.78 Beneish cutoff is US-calibrated; ~28% of VN stocks exceed it.
Checks measured on Vietnamese companies · FY2025
- Receivables outside the trade cyclePrepayments to suppliers, loans and other long-term receivables / total assets
- 1.7%46th pctile
- Accumulated losses / paid-in capitalUndistributed earnings below zero
- 0.90×
- Consecutive years of net lossProfit after tax of the parent
- 2
- Owner's equityWithout the non-controlling interest
- Positive
Percentiles rank each fiscal year against Vietnamese non-financial companies (0 lowest, 100 highest). Over FY2015-2024, low cash conversion and a large share of receivables outside the trade cycle came before more listing trouble and more net losses the next year.
Statutory loss tests (Decree 155/2020/NĐ-CP, Art. 120(1)(e), amended by Decree 245/2025/NĐ-CP): a HOSE or HNX listing is cancelled when the audited annual statements show net losses in each of the latest 3 years, accumulated losses above the paid-in charter capital, or negative owner's equity. Read here from the annual statements as the data vendor publishes them. The company trades on UPCoM, where these tests do not apply.
The accounting indicators for PSH show multiple signals of aggressive or stressed financial reporting: a Beneish M-Score of 1.9939 (97th percentile vs Vietnamese peers) with a year-over-year increase of +1.59, an Altman Z-Score of -0.45 (distress zone) and a weak Piotroski F-Score of 2/9. Earnings-quality sub-scores are very poor overall (Earnings Quality 19.8/100) with near-zero scores for cash conversion, receivables quality, margin quality and revenue quality, while accruals quality is high (99.1/100).
- Beneish M-Score = 1.9939 (97th percentile among Vietnamese peers). The Beneish M-Score estimates the probability of earnings manipulation using eight financial ratios; PSH’s score is high versus Vietnamese companies and rose by +1.59 year-over-year, indicating a notable change in the accounting profile.
- DSRI = 7.9188. The Days’ Sales Receivables Index measures changes in receivables relative to sales; a DSRI this large indicates receivables grew much faster than sales in the period measured.
- SGAI = 7.8371. The Sales, General & Administrative expenses Index compares SG&A to sales year-over-year; such a large SGAI suggests SG&A escalated relative to sales, which can signal expense recognition or timing issues.
- LVGI = 1.1978 and GMI = 1.2379. LVGI (leverage index) >1 and GMI (gross margin index) >1 indicate increasing leverage and deteriorating gross margins, both consistent with business or accounting stress.
- Altman Z-Score = -0.45 (distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a composite distance-to-default metric; a negative value places the company in the distress zone on this bankruptcy-proximity metric.
- Piotroski F-Score = 2/9. The Piotroski F-Score measures nine fundamental signals of financial health; a score of 2 indicates weak operational and profitability signals.
- Earnings-quality sub-scores very low: Cash conversion = 0.0/100, Receivables quality = 0.0/100, Margin quality = 0.0/100, Revenue quality = 0.0/100. These low component scores indicate poor cash generation relative to earnings, weak receivable dynamics, and weakness in margins and revenue quality.
- Three-year checks: Accumulated losses = 0.41× paid-in capital and a net loss in 1 consecutive years up to FY2024. Accumulated losses at 41% of paid-in capital signal historical retained-loss recognition, and the recent net loss is a financial-statement fact.
- Accruals quality = 99.1/100. This indicates that the accruals component of earnings is of high measured quality relative to peers, suggesting current-period earnings are not dominated by abnormal accruals by that metric.
- Receivables outside the trade cycle = 1.7% of total assets (47th percentile). The specific share of receivables outside the ordinary trade cycle—prepayments to suppliers, loans receivable and other long-term receivables—is moderate in the Vietnamese peer context (near the median).
- Owner's equity (excluding minority interest) is positive. The balance sheet retains positive parent equity despite losses and distress signals.
Ownership is highly concentrated: Mai Văn Huy holds 42.6% of shares; the next significant registered holder is Mai Hữu Phúc at 0.4% with other named individuals at or near 0.0%. No director-deal registrations were provided in the supplied data; note that any such exchange registrations would represent intentions rather than completed trades.
- Compare the movement in accounts receivable and sales in the notes to the financial statements to reconcile the DSRI = 7.9188 (look for line-items: trade receivables, prepayments, related-party receivables and revenue by segment).
- Inspect the SG&A and cost-of-goods-sold schedules to reconcile SGAI = 7.8371 and GMI = 1.2379 (check the SG&A note, and any one-off expense disclosures or restructuring charges).
- Examine the related-party note for loans receivable, prepayments to suppliers and other long-term receivables to verify the composition behind the 'receivables outside the trade cycle = 1.7% of total assets'.
- Review the statement of changes in equity and the retained earnings/accumulated losses line to confirm 'accumulated losses = 0.41× paid-in capital' and the parent-company net loss in the most recent year.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
- P/B
- 1.85
- P/S
- —
- ROE
- −144.6%
- ROA
- −5.9%
- EPS
- −4.978
- BVPS
- 955
- Gross Margin
- 637.9%
- Net Margin
- 23275.4%
- D/E
- 42.47
- Current Ratio
- 0.69
- Rev Growth
- −97.6%
- Profit Growth
- +18.5%
- EV/EBITDA
- —
- Div Yield
- —
Company Overview
- Shares outstanding
- 126M
- Charter Capital
- 1,262B VND
- Sector (ICB L2)
- Điện, nước & xăng dầu khí đốt
- Industry (ICB L3)
- Nước & Khí đốt
- Sub-industry
- Phân phối xăng dầu & khí đốt
- Company Type
- CT